VIDEO

Video generation cost. Runway vs Pika vs Luma at your output volume.

Punch in clips per month and length. We work out which subscription tier covers your credit burn — and where you'll blow past it.

UPDATED · 2026-04-25 RATES · VERIFIED FROM EACH PROVIDER FREE · NO SIGN-UP

Compare AI video tool costs

INTERACTIVE · LIVE · CREDIT-BASED PRICING

STANDARD = fast/turbo models (Runway Gen-3 Turbo, Pika 2.5 default, Luma Ray Lite, Kling Standard). HIGH = full-quality 1080p generations (Runway Gen-3 Alpha, Pika 2.5 max-res, Luma Ray full, Kling Pro mode).

How it works: We compute total credits = clips × seconds × credits-per-second, then pick the smallest plan whose monthly credit allowance covers that burn. If no tier fits, we surface the gap.

BURN: 0 CREDITS / MONTH · 0 clips × 0s × 0 cr/s
PROVIDER MONTHLY PLAN FIT
Runway
$0
TRY RUNWAY →
Pika
$0
TRY PIKA →
Luma Dream Machine
$0
TRY LUMA →
Kling AI
$0
TRY KLING →

Methodology. Pricing and credit allowances verified directly from runwayml.com/pricing, pika.art/pricing, lumalabs.ai/pricing, and app.klingai.com on 2026-04-25. Credit-per-second rates use each vendor's published mapping for their fast/turbo and full-quality video models. We pick the smallest monthly plan whose included credits cover your projected burn — if you blow past the top tier, the tool tells you by how much. Vendors restructure tiers and credit ratios every few quarters; always confirm at the source before committing. Sora was excluded — OpenAI announced the consumer Sora discontinuation effective 2026-04-26, so any pricing comparison would expire the day after publish.

Sizing a build? We can scope the whole thing.

BOOK A CALL → SEE TOOL REVIEWS →